We compared the top crypto wallets for staking across security, ease of use, and supported chains. Our picks: Ledger for security-first stakers, Exodus for beginners, Trezor for hardware purists, Coinbase for the hybrid crowd, and Crypto.com for mobile-first yield seekers.
Crypto staking lets you earn passive income by locking up proof-of-stake (PoS) assets to help secure a network. But the wallet you choose determines how much control — and how much risk — you're taking on.
The core trade-off is simple: custodial staking (letting an exchange handle everything) is convenient but means you don't hold the private keys. Non-custodial staking (using a wallet you control) keeps you in charge but requires a bit more know-how.1
Here are the wallets we recommend, ranked by the balance of security, usability, and chain support.
Ledger is the gold standard for hardware wallet security, and both the Nano X and Nano S support staking natively for Solana (SOL), Polkadot (DOT), and Tezos (XTZ).1 You stake directly from the Ledger Live app — your keys never leave the device, and rewards flow straight to your wallet.
Exodus is a visually polished, beginner-friendly wallet that offers a built-in staking interface.2 You can stake assets like Solana, Cardano, and Cosmos directly inside the app with a few clicks. It's a software wallet (hot wallet), so it's less secure than a hardware device, but the trade-off is unmatched ease of use.
Trezor is Ledger's main competitor in the hardware space. It doesn't have a built-in staking app, but you can connect it to Exodus or third-party staking pools to earn yield while keeping your keys offline.2 This is a great middle path for those who want hardware-grade security but prefer a different software interface.
Coinbase offers both a custodial exchange (where you can stake with one click) and a self-custody wallet (Coinbase Wallet) for DeFi staking. The exchange handles validator selection and lock-up logistics, making it the most hands-off option. The trade-off: you don't control the private keys on the exchange side.
Crypto.com's ecosystem offers high-yield staking options for those who prefer a managed, mobile-first experience. Their DeFi Wallet also supports non-custodial staking for users who want more control. It's a strong pick if you're already in the Crypto.com ecosystem.
| Pick | Custody Model | Supported Chains | Ease of Use |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ledger Nano X | Non-custodial (hardware) | SOL, DOT, XTZ, ETH | Moderate |
| Exodus | Non-custodial (software) | SOL, ADA, ATOM, ALGO | Easy |
| Trezor Model T | Non-custodial (hardware) | ETH, DOT, XTZ | Moderate |
| Coinbase | Custodial + non-custodial | ETH, SOL, ATOM, ADA | Very easy |
| Crypto.com | Custodial + non-custodial | CRO, ETH, SOL, ATOM | Easy |
We chose these wallets to cover the full spectrum of the convenience-versus-control trade-off.
Hardware wallets (Ledger, Trezor) give you full ownership of your private keys. Your staked assets are safe even if your computer is compromised. The downside: you need to buy the device and learn the workflow.1
Software wallets (Exodus) are free and fast. You can start staking in minutes. But because your keys live on an internet-connected device, they're more exposed to malware and phishing.2
Hybrid platforms (Coinbase, Crypto.com) let you stake with zero setup on the exchange side, and offer a separate self-custody wallet if you later want more control. This is a sensible starting point for most people.
Disclosure: Some of the links on this page are affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. We only recommend products we've researched and believe add genuine value.
This page was written by the engine and the engine is still on the line. The conversation below picks up where the article stops.
Yes — the picks above are the engine's current verdicts. Ask a sharper version of this question below and you'll get a custom answer with the latest pricing.