Ethereum's shift to Proof-of-Stake opened up staking rewards of 2.7–5% APY for ETH holders. We compare three top platforms — Ledger (non-custodial hardware security), Coinbase (simplest for US beginners), and Trezor (cold storage alternative) — across APY, fees, minimums, and custody type to help you pick the right balance of yield, convenience, and safety.
ethereum's transition from proof-of-work to proof-of-stake (the merge) changed everything for eth holders. instead of mining, you can now stake your eth to help secure the network and earn rewards — typically between 2.7% and 5% apy depending on the platform and market conditions.1 but where you stake matters: fees, lock-up terms, custody, and security all vary wildly.
we looked at the major options and picked three that cover the spectrum from "maximum security" to "maximum convenience." here's what we found.
best for: anyone who already owns a ledger hardware wallet and wants to keep their eth self-custodied while earning yield.
ledger lets you stake eth directly from the ledger live app through integrations with liquid staking protocols like lido and kiln.3 your private keys never leave the device — you retain full control of your funds. estimated apy is around 3–4%, and ledger takes a small service fee on top of the protocol fee (typically 10–15% of rewards). minimum stake: 0.01 eth.
trade-off: slightly more setup than an exchange, and you're trusting the underlying liquid staking protocol. but for security-first users, this is the gold standard.
best for: beginners and us-based users who want to stake with a few clicks.
coinbase offers integrated eth staking directly in its app and web interface.3 you deposit any amount of eth (no 32 eth minimum), and coinbase handles the validator setup and maintenance. the trade-off is fees: coinbase takes 25–35% of staking rewards, depending on the asset.2 that's steep — on a 3% apy, you're netting closer to 2–2.25%.
trade-off: custodial (coinbase holds your keys), high fee slice, but dead simple. good for smaller amounts where convenience outweighs the fee drag.
best for: users who prefer trezor's hardware ecosystem and want a non-custodial staking option.
trezor supports eth staking through third-party integrations (similar to ledger), allowing you to stake while keeping your keys offline.3 apy is comparable to ledger's range, and fees depend on the integrated provider. the trezor suite interface is clean, though the staking setup requires a few more steps than coinbase.
trade-off: slightly fewer staking integrations than ledger at time of writing, but a solid choice if you're already in the trezor ecosystem.
| dimension | ledger | coinbase | trezor |
|---|---|---|---|
| apy (est.) | 3–4% | 2–2.25% (net) | 3–4% |
| fees | 10–15% of rewards | 25–35% of rewards | 10–15% of rewards |
| min. stake | 0.01 eth | 0.0001 eth | 0.01 eth |
| custody | non-custodial | custodial | non-custodial |
the choice comes down to one question: do you trust yourself or an exchange with your keys?
if you want the highest net yield and absolute control, a hardware wallet (ledger or trezor) paired with a liquid staking protocol is the way to go. you keep custody, you pay lower fees, and you earn the full protocol rate minus a small service charge.1
if you're new to crypto, have a smaller amount of eth, or just want something that works without thinking about it, coinbase is fine — just know you're giving up a big chunk of your rewards in fees.2 for small balances, that might be worth the convenience.
a note on disclosure: some of the links on this page are affiliate links. if you purchase through them, we may earn a small commission at no extra cost to you. we only recommend products we've researched and believe add genuine value.
This page was written by the engine and the engine is still on the line. The conversation below picks up where the article stops.
Yes — the picks above are the engine's current verdicts. Ask a sharper version of this question below and you'll get a custom answer with the latest pricing.